South Korea braces for more export curbs as Moon Jae-in warns of ‘greater damage’ to Japan’s economy

By Julian Ryall – July 15 2019/ South China Moring Post

South Korea is braced for Japan to further escalate the countries’ trade dispute by removing Seoul from Tokyo’s “white list” of trusted trade partners and subsequently imposing new customs clearance restrictions on 40 categories of products, which could amount to 1,100 specific items.

Officials from the two countries made no progress in talks last Friday, leading Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry to suggest it could remove South Korea from the list of 27 preferred trading partners, which would require Japanese firms to obtain additional export verifications before selling to South Korean buyers. The Japanese government’s decision is expected to be announced on July 24 and would take effect 21 days later following a review process.

The 40 categories of products include isostatic presses, frequency changers, pressure transducers, titanium alloys, carbon fibre, vacuum pumps, generators, gyroscopes, crane trucks and milling machines.

Japan-South Korea ‘trade war’: has Tokyo shot itself in foot?

Within those broad categories, the Korea Strategic Trade Institute estimated about 1,100 specific items could be subject to the new restrictions, according to the Korea Times.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in on Monday struck a defiant tone, warning Japan it was “breaking the frameworks of Korea-Japan economic cooperation that has been built upon mutual reliance and reciprocal benefits over the past half-century”.

Earlier this month, Japan tightened restrictions on the export to South Korea of three materials used to produce semiconductors and mobile phone display screens, alleging there was “inadequate management” of these materials which could also be used to make weapons.

Bilateral ties have also been strained by divisive historical issues after South Korean court rulings ordering Japanese companies to compensate victims of wartime forced labour.

“Japan’s regulations on the white list cover a comprehensive list of items based on the arbitrary standards for national security concerns, adding uncertainties to Korean companies,” researcher Kim Gyu-pan said in a report by the state-run Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.

“Hi-tech chemical materials and lithium-ion batteries, which are used in military applications, as well as some machine tools could be subject to fresh export curbs by Japan.”

I warn that in the end, there will be greater damage to the Japanese economy

Moon Jae-in, South Korean president

The escalating trade spat between the closely intertwined Asian neighbours has also raised concerns over a disruption in the global supply chain because South Korean chip makers, including Samsung and SK Hynix, account for more than 70 per cent of the global memory chip output.

Moon pledged South Korean firms, which have scrambled to identify alternative suppliers to reduce disruptions, would succeed in diversifying their sources.

“I warn that in the end, there will be greater damage to the Japanese economy,” he said at a meeting of his top aides.

Robert Dujarric, a professor of international relations at the Tokyo campus of Temple University, said both sides were “talking tough” and their refusal to back down was cause for concern.

“[But] neither side wants a full-blown trade war and both sides do realise that it will hurt their economies,” he said.

Explained: the legacy of war in Asia

Dujarric also suggested that even if Japan went ahead with the new restrictions it could mitigate the impact by targeting items less critical to South Korea or by not enforcing the restrictions so tightly.

Japan has demanded South Korea respond to its proposal for a third-party arbitration panel to address the forced labour issue by Thursday.

Bong Young-shik from the Asan Institute for Policy Studies said the South Korean government could explore a compromise proposal acknowledging Japan’s position that compensation claims arising from Japan’s period of colonial rule on the Korean peninsula had already been fully settled.

Do you need Help? Get in touch.

Feel free to contact TNETS for information on any matter related to customs or trade compliance. We're here to help!